forhiscause: (✹ α ρяσвℓєм тσ ƒιχ)
ᑕᗝᖇ♈ᗩﬡᗩ ([personal profile] forhiscause) wrote in [community profile] onepassingnight 2013-01-31 02:56 pm (UTC)

"If it's me? Now what is that supposed to mean?"

Cortana was a machine regardless of how her personality and her behavior could prove otherwise. Her process's were rational and depended on logic. When there was a missing variable to an equation, Cortana couldn't continue the process. Sure, she was able to regroup her sources and find an interchanging loop to get around her missing variable and continue the process, but when it was something both outdated and unproven, she met her limit. Trying to test an unproven theory was like trying to find a way to divide by zero; the process was just a big blank DNE (does not exist).

"I understand both Einstein and Hawking weren't even sure what their hypothesis meant or whether or not it was true, that's why it's not a true theory. They couldn't prove it and as much as we've discovered more rationality to help, there's no way I could possibly prove that what you say was true. If you want a rational explanation then it's a lot easier to prove that you don't exist rather than you claiming to somehow finding a way to travel through dimensions without burning to a crisp."

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting